This is why AMC shorts are not in control and another squeeze is imminent

There is no sign that the AMC stock's infinite squeeze is ending anytime soon. This play is not about squeezing the shorts but it is all about putting them out of business for malpractice and manipulations. This article provides evidence (one of many) in support of that argument based on available data.

Retail investors should know that the shorts are not in control of the stock and its price. The squeeze has yet a task to complete: To punish and possibly blow up a few short institutions who have engaged in illegal (or rather seemingly legal) dilution and naked shorting of AMC and other stocks such as GME. Some short funds and institutions have been utilizing their market maker affiliates to dilute certain stocks using an infinity short loop which will be discussed later. So, here are the reasons why a few specific short institutions are targeted:

The chart below (top institutional holders of AMC) shows a significant increase in institutional involvement in AMC squeeze that indicates no sign of retreat. You may wonder why? I will dissect the chart below and will explain few patterns and comparisons. 

The major institutional holders you see on this chart are the primary force behind the AMC price action and a source of conviction among retail investors. Let's quickly take a look at the net worth of these institutions versus the major shorts:

BlackRock is the world's largest asset management firm, with Assets under Management of almost $7.4 trillion

The Vanguard Group, Inc. is an American registered investment advisor based in Malvern, Pennsylvania with about $7 trillion.

State Street Global Advisors is the world's third-largest asset manager and provider of exchange traded funds (ETFs), with total assets under management of $3.5 trillion as of December 31, 2020.

On the other hand, we have some major shorts:

1- Citadel Securities manages $34 billion in assets. Citadel Advisors has a portfolio of $384 billion.

2- Virtu Financials Inc. has a total asset worth $10.4 billion.

3- Susquehanna (an option Market Maker). Susquehanna International Group, LL. P.'s portfolio is also worth about $72.5 billion.

There are other major AMC shorts such as Simplex Trading but they are not market makers and therefore "less able" to actively dilute the shares of AMC. Currently, Simplex Trading's portfolio is worth at least $2.82 billion. 

Looking at the net worth of these institutions, it is no secret that the AMC shorts may lose everything and for a good reason. They are taking advantage of market with certain loopholes that may or may not be illegal by nature but they are certainly illegal if used in certain ways. The SEC has shown no interest in dealing with these issues and is more interested in preserving status quo or maintaining an "orderly market" giving ample time favorably to shorts to get their act together and possibly reduce the short squeeze mania that could potentially disrupt the market. 

See GME and AMC Side-by-side comparison of institutional backers for more information.

Citadel knows their days are over and they are trapped in their short positions hiding phantom share which they have created over time and repeatedly pushed through the system via an infinity loop with the help of OTC markets and dark pool trading. Notably, according to Bloomberg Citadel "updated its liquidity terms this year for all investors, reverting to a formula that under certain circumstances limits quarterly withdrawals to 6.25% -- meaning it would take 16 quarters (four years) to fully pull out." These are troubling signs.

Ultimately, it seems like this fight is not a fight between retails and Citadel. The retails are the biggest assets of AMC and they are one of the reasons the institutional interest in the stock has increased dramatically. But the retail has done its job and will continue to buy and hold. It is now very much an institutional battle and all signs point to yet another short squeeze in the chain of infinite squeezes like the one TSLA experienced. The goal is set. 

As the chart above shows these institutions started buying AMC at the end of 2020 and primarily ignored the January events (AKA Robinhood and Citadel collusion/scandals) and continued to buy. 

These institutions at some point in April reduced the buy pressure for two possible reasons: a) They already knew the entire float is sold perhaps multiple times (and as I compare this to GME chart later this point becomes more clear) b) They wanted to dry up the volume and stop feeding the beast. A beast that can easily take advantage of lack of regulations with the current seemingly legal infinity loop injecting non-existing shares into the system. The same pattern is detected from late October 2021 as indicted by the red box in the bottom right corner in the chart above which will be discussed later.

Obviously, these long institutions did not stop buying in April waiting for one squeeze to happen. As the chart shows they were not interested in selling when the price hit $72. In fact, as the chart below shows, they continued to buy after the June run-up. Why? This is an indication that the infinity squeeze is on. Anyone who has watched how short squeezes play out would notice something is different about AMC. 

Yes. Infinite squeeze may be in horizon for AMC. As the chart below shows, the same institutions along with many more funds and institutions not only did not sell any shares, they continued to buy more AMC shares after the June run-up.

Interestingly, the buying pressure from these institutions again stopped late September and perhaps for the same two reasons described above. The key here is time. Infinity squeezes are the most effective when they are dragged for a prolonged periods of time. From a technical point of view, 200 EMA is the best friend of an infinity squeeze candidate. If this chart is an indication of anything it would be that it is about time institutions "create" another run-up through volatility (sudden up and down) and utilization of gamma ramp. 

Now, why major institutions and funds such as Blackrock and Vanguard have taken matters into their own hand?

When a financial system does not have a mechanism to protect the interest of all participants equally some players take matters into their own hands. The inability of SEC to regulate the market is nothing new.

Citadel once was a victim of payment for order flow and according to their court filings in 2004, they ask the SEC to patch up a hole in the system but the SEC as usual failed. Here is what Citadel lawyers identified as one of the problems in the system in the concluding paragraph

"For our listed options markets to reach their potential, the Commission must prohibit practices that create conflicts of interests between broker-dealers and their customers and that inhibit competitive, transparent, and deep markets. Market participants and exchanges should be required to display firm quotes and be held accountable for failing to honor quotes. Payment for order flow and internalization without meaningful price improvement should be banned because they disadvantage customers, undermine competition, and distort market prices."

Well, if you can't beat them join them! They simply could not beat the system so they joined in as they saw this opportunity widely available in the system to exploit. Now, those same lines are being used against Citadel itself but they can rest assured that SEC is not going to do anything about it because they tried to prevent losing money to a malpractice in the system and they failed.

The issue of synthetic shares, naked shorting, pitfalls of T6, T35 and infinity loops have been addressed elsewhere by the author and other people. Here is one example:

However, based on the available data we can safely assume that there are multiple ways to legally and illegally naked short any stock. But to make this more accessible to everyone lets watch this short video

On top of that, a unique initiative by retail investors to log the float of AMC provided their preliminary data and exposed that the secret of synthetic shares may very well lie beyond the borders of USA.

Since then AMC has paid more attention to its international shares. Recently, Adam Aron announced that international shareholders also can register on investor connect and can get the new "I Own AMC NFT"

Another study first published on Reddit based on a WEB API data source (trough Webull's clearing house Apex) provides yet another proof that AMC shares are sold short multiple times the entire float with a simple calculation. 

According to the Web API there are 128,441,952 shares of AMC on WeBull. This represents 24.99% of the shares outstanding and 43.01% of the retail float.

These numbers are incredibly huge. Given the Brokerage-Exodus and the big number of American AND international brokers, one can only speculate how many synthetic shares there are on the market in the hand of retail.There does not seem to be another explanation for these numbers if the data is slightly accurate.

Log the Float project, as the only Ape-powered data source, intends to analyze the 8000+ submitted screenshots of AMC retail shares in order to identify the percentage of shares submitted from Webull and Robinhood (based on the screenshots) in comparison to the rest of the submissions (from other brokers) to get a good estimate of the percentage of non-Webull and non-Robinhood shares to be added to 130M shares (that we affirmatively know of on Webull and Robinhood) to provide yet another proof that synthetic shares are very much real. Many institutions have known about it for a while and have effectively trapped Citadel et. al. in a pickle jar. AMC at the moment is where GME was at the end of 2020. GME is the ultimate ticking bomb and now AMC is effectively another ticking bomb that could concurrently strike a fatal blow to a number of market manipulators.  

GME and AMC Side-by-side comparison of institution...

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to

Please help us log more AMC and GME shares:

We need about 980 more retail investors to log their shares so we can reach our targeted goal to publish the data and the results with high confidence level (95%+).